Acquire the following protein sequences from NCBI Protein: WP_010907941.1 and WP_058199673.1. Note the organism each protein came from.Â
Quiz Summary
0 of 19 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Results
0 of 19 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Current
- Review
- Answered
- Correct
- Incorrect
-
Question 1 of 19
1. Question
From the first iteration of PSI-BLAST results comparing WP_010907941.1 to the non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database, what was the identity of top scoring protein?
-
Question 2 of 19
2. Question
From the first iteration of PSI-BLAST results comparing WP_010907941.1 to the non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database, how many of the top 20 matches were hypothetical proteins?
-
Question 3 of 19
3. Question
Is WP_010907941.1 stable according to ProtParam?
-
Question 4 of 19
4. Question
What is the location for WP_010907941.1 according to PSORT?
-
Question 5 of 19
5. Question
For WP_010907941.1 analyzed by InterPro, which of the following identified domains are associated with quinohemoprotein? Select all that apply.
-
Question 6 of 19
6. Question
What percentage of WP_010907941.1 was modelled?
-
Question 7 of 19
7. Question
What was the confidence of the model prediction for WP_010907941.1 as a percentage?
-
Question 8 of 19
8. Question
What was the identity of the top template used for the WP_010907941.1 model prediction?
-
Question 9 of 19
9. Question
Based on the evidence produced in this course so far, what should be the annotation for WP_010907941.1?
-
Question 10 of 19
10. Question
Would WP_010907941.1 be a good candidate for further laboratory experiments?
-
Question 11 of 19
11. Question
From the first iteration of PSI-BLAST results comparing WP_058199673.1 to the non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database, what was the identity of top scoring protein?
-
Question 12 of 19
12. Question
From the first iteration of PSI-BLAST results comparing WP_058199673.1 to the non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database, how many of the top 20 matches were hypothetical proteins?
-
Question 13 of 19
13. Question
Is WP_058199673.1 stable according to ProtParam?
-
Question 14 of 19
14. Question
What is the location for WP_058199673.1 according to PSORT?
-
Question 15 of 19
15. Question
For WP_058199673.1 analyzed by InterPro, which of the following identified domains spans more than half of the protein’s length?
-
Question 16 of 19
16. Question
What percentage of WP_058199673.1 was modelled?
-
Question 17 of 19
17. Question
What was the confidence of the model prediction for WP_058199673.1 as a percentage?
-
Question 18 of 19
18. Question
Based on the evidence produced so far, what should be the annotation for WP_058199673.1?
-
Question 19 of 19
19. Question
Would WP_058199673.1 be a good candidate for further laboratory experiments?